[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Abacus-36

[Walter Bender]

On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, 28 September 2012, Walter Bender wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I am not sure what problem we are trying to solve. If I give you any
>> >> release number > than the latest gtk2 version, won't that solve your
>> >> problem? And if I label that release with 0.96+ in ASLO, won't that
>> >> resolve itself re old Sugar systems? I think the solution may lie in
>> >> simply not making tar balls for gtk2 versions.
>> >>
>> >> -walter
>> >>
>> >
>> > It's true you can just don't publish tarballs of gtk2 versions,
>> > but probably will be confusing for the users.
>> > Should be good if we can agree in a consistent numbers in activities.
>> > If we decide the proposed schema does not works (dotted version for
>> > gtk2,
>> > integer for gtk3) we should talk and define a new one.
>> > I like the proposal from Peter, just start with 100 with gtk3 versions
>> > looks sane.
>>
>> I don't agree re 100+ simply because some activities already have
>> greater than 100 versions (TA, Browse, etc.). We could start at 1000,
>> I suppose. But why not just use even for gtk2 and odd for gtk3?
>
>
>  IMO we don't need consistency between activities about the number, just
> about the general approach (i.e. gtk3 starting with a number high enough
> that gtk2 < gtk3).
>
> About even and odd, I guess it would work if you make sure the highest
> number is always gtk3. Which is possible but feels a bit complicated to me,
> I don't know.
>
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
>

I think the whole problem arose because I forgot to release the gtk-3
version. I'll do so ASAP.

-walter

-- 
Walter Bender
Sugar Labs
http://www.sugarlabs.org