[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Release Abacus-36

[Daniel Narvaez]

On Friday, 28 September 2012, Walter Bender wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Gonzalo Odiard <gonzalo at laptop.org<javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I am not sure what problem we are trying to solve. If I give you any
> >> release number > than the latest gtk2 version, won't that solve your
> >> problem? And if I label that release with 0.96+ in ASLO, won't that
> >> resolve itself re old Sugar systems? I think the solution may lie in
> >> simply not making tar balls for gtk2 versions.
> >>
> >> -walter
> >>
> >
> > It's true you can just don't publish tarballs of gtk2 versions,
> > but probably will be confusing for the users.
> > Should be good if we can agree in a consistent numbers in activities.
> > If we decide the proposed schema does not works (dotted version for gtk2,
> > integer for gtk3) we should talk and define a new one.
> > I like the proposal from Peter, just start with 100 with gtk3 versions
> > looks sane.
>
> I don't agree re 100+ simply because some activities already have
> greater than 100 versions (TA, Browse, etc.). We could start at 1000,
> I suppose. But why not just use even for gtk2 and odd for gtk3?
>

 IMO we don't need consistency between activities about the number, just
about the general approach (i.e. gtk3 starting with a number high enough
that gtk2 < gtk3).

About even and odd, I guess it would work if you make sure the highest
number is always gtk3. Which is possible but feels a bit complicated to me,
I don't know.


-- 
Daniel Narvaez
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20120928/e61ce985/attachment.html>