[Sugar-devel] Datastore is broken

[Gonzalo Odiard]

I have received a few false warnings.
Are you checking the commits related to the failing module
or all the commits from the last build?

Gonzalo

On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Daniel Narvaez <dwnarvaez at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 9 November 2012 09:19, Simon Schampijer <simon at schampijer.de> wrote:
> > Ok, I pushed Martin's fix. Sorry we did regress in the latest commit :/
> >
> > Daniel, the buildbot is very valuable, which are the places a developer
> > should look at if he wants to get a quick overview.
> >
> > So, let's say, Fedora should at least build (given the current status of
> > Ubuntu) [1] and then check the tests result here [2]?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >    Simon
> >
> > [1] http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/one_line_per_build
> > [2]
> >
> http://buildbot.sugarlabs.org/builders/fedora-17-32bit/builds/665/steps/shell_3/logs/stdio
>
> Yup! I tend to use the waterfall rather than one_line_per_build but
> that's just a personal preference.
>
> Just keep in mind that there are a few sources of unreliability at the
> moment, so a red build doesn''t necessarily mean there is a bug with
> your code. Those are:
>
> 1 Unreliability of the UI tests. They are timing dependent so it's
> hard to get them right.
> 2 Network issues. Sometimes bender network goes down, sometimes
> freedesktop etc
> 3 Random segfaults when buillding gst-ffmpeg
> 4 Ubuntu tests are still a work in progress (especially the
> crash-on-exit issue on 12.10)
>
> I think I'm finally getting there for 1, I haven't seen random test
> failures on the fedora slaves in a while and anyway I think I
> understand the issues involved now, so I'll hopefully have this solved
> soon. 2 cannot really be avoided completely, I hope to be able to mark
> those builds with something different than a normal red failure, so
> that it's immediately clear they don't need developer attention. I
> have no idea what to do about 3 other than waiting Fedora 18 is out,
> hopefully it doesn't happen too often. I'm working on 4, it will take
> some time but it's just work.
>
> Something else I want to do is to get fix of all the tracebacks
> triggered by the UI tests, then we can mark the tracebacks as
> warnings, and use buildbot to avoid that kind of regressions too (we
> have so many right now that it's difficult to find a new issue in the
> logs).
>
> --
> Daniel Narvaez
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20121109/b4678b1a/attachment.html>