[Sugar-devel] Clock's es.po commented

[Chris Leonard]

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Rafael Ortiz
<rafael at activitycentral.com> wrote:
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Pootle problem ?


FWIW, if the change in the codebase is reverted, the old strings are
still present in all of the Po files (stuck at the bottom, commented
as deprecated strings) and they will magically reappear when a correct
POT is used for an "update from templates" round.

cjl