[Sugar-devel] Call for testing and feedback: alternative Journal implementation

[Christophe Guéret]

>  How compare SemanticXO journal to our actual implementation, regarding to
> disk space and performance (in a xo)
>
However I agree this is an important question, I can not give any proper
answer to it yet.
Some time ago I did some performance test for the triple store:
http://semweb4u.wordpress.com/2011/11/02/does-it-scale/
The results were not as good as I would have expected but were still ok.

Now, it would be good to run a comparative benchmark to have the same kind
of curves for both the genuine journal and the one using the triple store.
Is there maybe something I could use for that?
To generate these graphs I used a custom made record generator that was
inserting data and querying it. If nothing else is available I could use
that code again.

Besides, I'd like to note that apart from the performance difference, which
may or may not be in favour of the triple store, there is also a feature
difference. Compared to the current data store, the triple store offers a
more versatile data store with also has remote access (not secured now).
We're currently busy developing activities highlighting how to take
advantage from these extra features.

Christophe
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20120510/9c04597e/attachment.html>