[Sugar-devel] Wanting to know a bit of (NetworkManager) workflow upon resume-from-suspend

[Martin Abente]

just in case, did you try this combination:

libertas(without the patch) + disable_mesh.sh(removed) +
resume-from-suspend (?)

IF NM still crashes then we have been looking in the wrong direction, if
not then we need to look deeper into the patch probably (@silbe ;)).

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Ajay Garg <ajaygargnsit at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 3:42 AM, Martin Abente
> <martin.abente.lahaye at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Did you remove the disable mesh.script for the testing?
>
> Yes.
>
> Both from ::
>
> a)
> my custom added in '/etc/init.d/NetworkManager'.
>
> b)
> '/etc/powed/postresume.d/disable_mesh.sh'
>
>
> Regards,
> Ajay
> >
> > El may 4, 2012 10:39 p.m., "Ajay Garg" <ajaygargnsit at gmail.com>
> escribió:
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Sascha Silbe <silbe at activitycentral.com
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> > Ajay Garg <ajaygargnsit at gmail.com> writes:
> >> >
> >> > [...]
> >> >> b)
> >> >> Ensured that '/etc/modprobe.d/libertas.conf' contained only the
> >> >> following line ::
> >> >>
> >> >>               options libertas libertas_disablemesh=0
> >> > [...]
> >> >> f)
> >> >> Upon resume-from-suspend, NO ICONS COULD BE SEEN IN NEIGHBORHOOD
> VIEW.
> >> >
> >> > Interesting.
> >> >
> >> >> g)
> >> >> Observations e) and f) were observed, _every single time_.
> >> >
> >> > OK, I suppose you repeated this often enough and using exactly the
> same
> >> > environment and procedures as the other test cases? I.e. you are sure
> >> > that it's really specific to libertas_disablemesh=0 rather than just
> >> > occurring at random even without the libertas_disablemesh setting or
> >> > based on how the suspend / resume was triggered (e.g. idle suspend
> >> > vs. lid or power switch)?
> >>
> >> I tried 3 times, and it happened every time. (I tried with the "lid"
> >> approach every time, under identical conditions and set of
> >> procedures.).
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > I don't see anything in the patch or the module params code that would
> >> > explain this behaviour. If it's reproducible, I'll have to dive into
> it
> >> > and debug a bit...
> >>
> >> It is reproducible every time (at least at my end). :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Thanks for testing, BTW!
> >>
> >> My pleasure :)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Sascha
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > http://sascha.silbe.org/
> >> > http://www.infra-silbe.de/
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Ajay
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Sugar-devel mailing list
> >> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> >> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20120505/8224e9a3/attachment.html>