[Sugar-devel] Wanting to know a bit of (NetworkManager) workflow upon resume-from-suspend

Ajay Garg ajaygargnsit at gmail.com
Wed May 2 11:07:19 EDT 2012


On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Martin Langhoff
<martin.langhoff at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Ajay Garg <ajaygargnsit at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Good News.
> >
> > I managed to get this working (albeit via changes in sugar).
> >
> > The details are at ::
> >
> http://git.sugarlabs.org/dextrose/mainline/commit/4ac1a5300f4c43608b0f009a23d966d404a15632
>
> The patch seems fairly wrong to me. You are hiding the mesh icons in
> sugar, but the mesh is active. Packet forwarding is still happening.
>


Hmm, ok (didn't know this).

I believe that the number of packets being forwarded in this, would be
(much) less than in the scenario when the users are actually connected to a
mesh-network-channel.
Kindly affirm/reject my above notion :)


Regards,
Ajay



>
> One of the top reasons we stopped using mesh is because it saturates
> the RF spectrum, which is a bad thing to do when you have many users
> in a small space (ie: in a school).
>
> You had the mesh disable trick working on F11, and (I assume) happy
> users of that feature. With this, the feature is broken, but you're
> making the UI look right...
>
> cheers,
>
>
>
> m
> --
>  martin.langhoff at gmail.com
>  martin at laptop.org -- Software Architect - OLPC
>  - ask interesting questions
>  - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
>  - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20120502/dccf4e9e/attachment.html>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list