[Sugar-devel] Etoys mp3 files
Ajay Garg
ajay at activitycentral.com
Sat Jun 2 01:18:40 EDT 2012
Hi Bert.
Would it be possible for you to provide with the following ::
a)
Core etoys-code (the complete source tree is highly desirable :-) ).
b)
Sugar glue-code.
Thanks and Regards,
Ajay
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:23 AM, Ajay Garg <ajay at activitycentral.com> wrote:
> Thanks Bert.
>
> 1)
> Bert, I re-compiled after installing all the header- and devel- packages
> as told by you (after incorporating a blocker-fix as per
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.smalltalk.squeak.general/146266
> ).
>
> However, I still am not able to hear any sound.
>
>
> 2)
> I also tried copying all the so.* files from my Dell laptop (where the
> sound was being heard) to the XO-1 (where sound is not being heard).
> However, still no sound is heard.
>
>
> So, I guess that now, there is some etoys software-hardware
> intervention-issue that might be blocking the final destination (it must be
> noted that sound is heard fine, outside the context of etoys).
>
>
> Any ideas will be gratefully appreciated; me too is looking into this.
>
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Ajay
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert at freudenbergs.de>wrote:
>
>> I sent my patch to the upstream maintainer (Ian Piumarta). I'm hopeful
>> there will be a new 4.x VM release very soon.
>>
>> That new release will also help with Scratch because it will have the
>> Scratch plugins (so the Scratch XO bundle do not need any binaries inside
>> anymore), and with Etoys 5 (which needs a new Camera plugin). 4.4.7 already
>> helps DrGeo (which uses a newer Squeak format), and on 64 bit hosts
>> (because many of the 32/64 bit problems have been worked out), and has
>> numerous other improvements.
>>
>> Similarly, the dprintf bug you see has been fixed in 2009 according to
>> the change log. It really makes not much sense trying to fix that old
>> codebase. Rather package the new 4.x VM.
>>
>> Btw, here is a list of build requirements for squeak-vm (you need to
>> watch the install log to make sure that plugins and features are not
>> disabled because of missing dev headers):
>>
>> gcc make cmake pulseaudio-libs-devel alsa-lib-devel nas-devel
>> libogg-devel libvorbis-devel speex-devel uuid-devel dbus-devel pango-devel
>> gstreamer-devel mesa-libGL-devel libX11-devel libXext-devel
>> libXrender-devel freetype-devel
>>
>> - Bert -
>>
>> PS: I found an MPEG movie that works
>> http://esug.org/data/HistoricalDocuments/Smalltalk80/st80-low.mpg
>>
>> On 30.05.2012, at 19:42, Ajay Garg wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Bert.
>> > It worked at my side too !!!!
>> >
>> > The mp3 played fine at my end though :| :)
>> >
>> > However, I now face the ubiquitous packaging issue. As it stands out,
>> the src-rpm available is "squeak-vm-3.10.5-5.fc14.src.rpm", which has some
>> very different installation schemes as compared to the "
>> http://www.squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-4.4.7.2357-src.tar.gz"
>> scheme.
>> >
>> > Worse, the make for "3.10.5-5" variant fails with the error ::
>> >
>> >
>> ############################################################################
>> > In file included from
>> /home/ajay/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Squeak-3.10-5/platforms/unix/vm/debug.c:3:0:
>> > /usr/include/stdio.h:419:66: error: macro "dprintf" passed 3 arguments,
>> but takes just 1
>> > /home/ajay/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Squeak-3.10-5/platforms/unix/vm/debug.c: In
>> function ‘__sq_assert’:
>> >
>> /home/ajay/rpmbuild/SOURCES/Squeak-3.10-5/platforms/unix/vm/debug.c:21:3:
>> warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘abort’
>> > make[1]: *** [debug.o] Error 1
>> > make: *** [vm/vm.a] Error 2
>> >
>> ############################################################################
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > So, does there exist a way to make a rpm out of "4.4.7.2357" variant,
>> with the "Mpeg3Plugin/config.cmake" patch applied?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks a ton for your time.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks and Regards,
>> > Ajay
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20120602/e35fac51/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list