[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Problem with number of version
walter.bender at gmail.com
Wed Jul 18 21:29:52 EDT 2012
Peru is slowing moving to 11.3 (Sugar 0.94) but there are many 0.84
machines in the field.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn
<alanjas at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> We should not be using dotted version numbers for activities intended to
>> be installed at deployments running builds older than Sugar 0.92.0.
> In Uruguay, one week ago, the latest image was Sugar 0.88 !
> Now (by luck) we have Sugar 0.94 :-)
> In others deployments, what Sugar version are their using?
> For example, have sense maintain in the code "back compatibility" with sugar
> < 0.86 ??
More information about the Sugar-devel