[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Frame Device icon Volumes
Gonzalo Odiard
gonzalo at laptop.org
Sun Aug 19 09:45:49 EDT 2012
There are a convention about the position of the primary action?
Should be the closest to the button or the first at top of the palette?
I think is important have this defined, and may be show it in a special way.
In this particular case, the option is between the label, another action and
the widget showing the size, and is not obvious.
Gonzalo
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:53 AM, Simon Schampijer <simon at schampijer.de>wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 03:25 PM, Manuel Quiñones wrote:
>
>> 2012/8/16 Gary Martin <garycmartin at googlemail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On 16 Aug 2012, at 09:44, Simon Schampijer <simon at schampijer.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> working on the 'reveal palette on left click' behavior change for the
>>>> Frame device icons [1] I came across the following behavior for the Volumes
>>>> device icons:
>>>>
>>>> - when you click on the icon it will resume the Journal and show the
>>>> contents of the volume
>>>>
>>>> - if you reveal the Palette (right click or hover) you get the Palette
>>>> (see screen-shot):
>>>>
>>>> [Label]
>>>> [Remove option]
>>>> [info about free space]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think there are two issues with the current behavior:
>>>>
>>>> - the primary action which triggers the 'show content' is not reflected
>>>> in the Palette, if you bring up the Palette you can not find that action in
>>>> the Palette, this is about discover-ability
>>>>
>>>> - secondly as we are currently moving to the behavior for bringing up
>>>> the Palette on left click for the device icons it makes sense to be
>>>> consistent here, so I would remove the primary action from the button,
>>>> hence on left click reveal the Palette containing the 'Show content' option
>>>> like we have for the Journal as first item in the Palette
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 to removal of the primary action, adding 'Show content' to the
>>> palette, and bringing up the palette on a left click.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, +1
>>
>
> I coded that up. Works much better imho, and the design I am happy with
> too (screenshot attached).
>
> Simon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20120819/b759bf80/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list