[Sugar-devel] Splitting up Honey on Pootle - proposal for discussion

[Gonzalo Odiard]

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>wrote:

> It may well be time to abandon our chemestry taxonomy and go to
> something less obscure.



+1 may be was cool in a moment, but does not help in any way.



> Maybe we can start a new thread on that topic?
>

Ok


> The purpose of this thread is to advance the notion of breaking up
> Honey. Moving half of Honey to Fructose doesn't solve the issues that
> Chris raised re performance. It was my thought that while we made the
> split, we could use the split to help prioritize the work for the i18n
> team.
>
>
I think we include 42 activities (from the point of view of l10n)
This is a big number for pootle performance?

Gonzalo




> regards.
>
> -walter
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddress at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > So Gonzalo and Anish, you guys are suggesting a switch (in Pootle) to
> > something like:
> >
> > Fructose > Default Activities
> >
> > Honey > Additional Activities 1
> >             > Additional Activities 2
> >
> > Am I getting that right?
> >
> > cjl
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20120423/7156d16b/attachment-0001.html>