[Sugar-devel] [PATCH sugar] Control Panel: making about my computer section hardware independent, OLPC #11232

Frederick Grose fgrose at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 13:54:36 EDT 2011


On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 2:31 AM, Simon Schampijer <simon at schampijer.de>wrote:

> On 10/17/2011 08:38 PM, Sascha Silbe wrote:
>
>> Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of 2011-10-17 11:07:13 +0200:
>>
>>  - powerpc is not a popular Sugar platform to make an enormous effort for
>>> supporting it
>>>
>>
>> I wouldn't consider anything we discussed an "enormous effort". With
>> that attitude PowerPC would never be a viable platform. Catch-22.
>>
>
> I knew people would jump on that. The original patch would not have had any
> impact on Sugar running on powerpc, just that the version displayed in the
> CP would not have a meaning. I could have lived with that. Still, I am
> waiting for reports of people running Sugar on powerpc...


Just for reference,
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Ubuntu/PPC
http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Community/Distributions/Fedora#PowerPC_Fedora_16


> And I don't think *this* is a blocker for them.
>
>
>  - displaying all of the string on both cases (OLPC/powerpc) will likely
>>> confuse people used to the old humanized string that is displayed at
>>> current
>>>
>>> - the string does always start with "CL": CL1 for XO-1, CL1B for XO-1.5,
>>> CL2 for XO-1.75, to differentiate we can do the following:
>>>
>>> if: string.startswith('CL') string[6:13]
>>> else: display all of the string
>>>
>>
>> Sounds good enough to me. We don't even need the length check as
>> foo[6:13] will simply give an empty string if foo is too short. Might be
>> good to add a comment to that effect, though.
>>
>
> I will send a new full patch.
>
>
> Regards,
>   Simon
> ______________________________**_________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.**org <Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/**listinfo/sugar-devel<http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20111018/0e7fe672/attachment.html>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list