[Sugar-devel] [FEATURE] Add can share/or not information to activities
Gonzalo Odiard
gonzalo at laptop.org
Wed Nov 16 05:11:03 EST 2011
May be is a good idea use max_participants in the .info file, allowing us
to limit the number of participants if needed,
and set the property in the sugar.activity class.
Gonzalo
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:11 AM, Gary Martin <garycmartin at googlemail.com>wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 14 Nov 2011, at 18:38, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose the following Feature for inclusion into Sugar:
> "Can share" [1].
> >
> > This feature will make it clearer if an activity can collaborate or not.
> So far we know inside an Activity if it is able to be shared or not because
> the share button is changing it's state accordingly (the button is made
> insensitive if the activity does not support collaboration). But there are
> other places that need to be aware if an activity supports collaboration or
> not. For example the buddy palette in the neighborhood view where you can
> invite a buddy to your activity. An invitation should only be possible if
> the activity supports collaboration.
> >
> > I propose to add a field to the activity.info file. This field should
> be named 'can_share' ad takes the values 'yes' and 'no' (like the
> 'show_launcher' field). The default value that is assumed if the field is
> not set will be 'no'. The reason here is that the activity maintainer who
> cares about collaboration sets the field and there are more activities that
> do NOT support collaboration than there are who do.
> >
> > The shell and the toolkit has to change, furthermore the activities that
> support sharing have to change their activity.info file.
>
> How does this relate to the self.max_participants = 1 value set inside
> current activities? Can it replace this previous api? If not, chances are
> will bump into bugs were the two values conflict and we end up with
> different parts of the UI showing different things. Is there any value in
> making 'can_share' an integer like 'self.max_participants' so the Sugar
> shell can know not to allow excess users into an activity that is already
> maxed out? Is anyone aware of any activities that actually use the
> self.max_participants for anything other than switching off collaboration
> UI?
>
> --Gary
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Simon
> >
> > [1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Can_share
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sugar-devel mailing list
> > Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> > http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20111116/83f73cf9/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list