[Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Secondary Menus

[Thomas C Gilliard]

On 5/7/11 8:30 AM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Peter Robinson<pbrobinson at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Walter Bender<walter.bender at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> On Sat, May 7, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Peter Robinson<pbrobinson at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> It seems in certain circumstances the second menus do work on Fedora
>>>> 15 (thanks Thomas for testing). I suspect there was a new dep added to
>>>> sugar for this feature that we're not actually depending on and its
>>>> hence only getting installed in certain situations. Can anyone who
>>>> worked on this verify what new deps are required for this feature? It
>>>> would be nice to get this fixed for F15, we only have a couple of days
>>>> to get the fix in.
>>> Any further details? Where are the results from Thomas posted?
>> Basically the live image doesn't work. If its installed another way
>> (from complete DVD or netinst or similar) it does. That sounds to me
>> there's a new dep (likely a python one) that we're not explicitly
>> pulling in for F-15 SoaS image that gets pulls in by something else in
>> a standard install. Is there a new python module that we used to
>> implement the secondary toolbars? Can someone look at the code and
>> give me a list of modules used for the secondary menus?
>>
>> There's more details in a recent response from me to the SoaS list.
>>
>> I'm going to try and recreate it but I'm travelling this weekend and I
>> might not get the chance so any info would help here.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Peter
>>
Does the point that the soas nightly compose come from branched, and 
netinstall does not, make a difference?
Tom Gilliard
(on the road)
> Thanks Peter. I will look into what dependencies are pulled in for the
> secondary menus, but it not immediate obvious that they are using
> anything special. (My uninformed theory is still that we are
> overriding a library name.)
>
> regards.
>
> -walter
>
>