[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Tech Report
David Farning
dfarning at activitycentral.com
Wed Mar 9 08:39:43 EST 2011
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sugar-devel-bounces at lists.sugarlabs.org [mailto:sugar-devel-
> bounces at lists.sugarlabs.org] On Behalf Of Chris Leonard
> Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2011 7:31 AM
> To: Walter Bender
> Cc: sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org; Aleksey Lim
> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Tech Report
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Chris Leonard
> <cjlhomeaddress at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't think it is necessarily essential to report current status
on every
> > language, that is tracked by the hosting L10n envirnment. I was
> suggesting
> > something much simpler.
> >
> > Yes/No on POT generated and hosted somewhere (or other L10n
> equivalent).
>
>
> I may be worth going one step further: since we have such a large
> Spanish-speaking community, some indication of whether or not there
is
> .es support in ASLO would be nice.
>
>
>
>
> Agreed on high importance of lang-es in particular, dirakx has filed a
number of
> ASLO tickets on things like translating descriptions. Then there is the
question of
> localizing ASLO itself (how much gets pulled from upstream, how to
localize the
> diff between AMO strings and ASLO strings, etc.).
I think there will be an un-conference part of the summit in UY. Perhaps a
translation track/room might work well. Talk about translation needs and how
to participate followed by mentored work session to try translating.
david
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list