[Sugar-devel] [ASLO] Tech Report

[Chris Leonard]

I don't think it is necessarily essential to report current status on every
language, that is tracked by the hosting L10n envirnment.  I was suggesting
something much simpler.

Yes/No on POT generated and hosted somewhere (or other L10n equivalent).

A link to where L10n on the Activity is performed.

Pootle itself has been re-based on Django if that makes any difference in
terms of the more sophisticated integration you are suggesting.

cjl

On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:07 AM, Aleksey Lim <alsroot at activitycentral.org>wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:40:44AM -0500, Chris Leonard wrote:
> > It would be highly desirable for ASLO to reflect the i18n status of an
> > Activity, ideally with a link to where the L10n of that activity is
> hosted
> > (it doesn't have to be translate.sugarlabs.org).  Far too many of the
> > Activities hosted in ASLO have not been internationalized / localized and
> > believe that promoting awareness of the importance of i18n/L10n should be
> a
> > core element of everything that Sugar Labs does.
> >
> > cjl
>
> Will percentage info (basing on untranslated strings in .po files) be
> good? It should be trivial to calculate it on activity release acceptance
> process.
>
> Though implementing it on ASLO in current sitation is problematic
> (though there are might be people who want to implement new features in
> php code w/ keeping in mind that it will be thrown away after switching
> to the django). At the same time, I'm working on totally different sugar
> sharing model(that looks-like/basis-on regular PMS) and going to have
> initial
> release in april. Such .po analysis might be implemented in the new system.
>
> --
> Aleksey
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20110309/ecafaca2/attachment.html>