[Sugar-devel] Fw: [Csnd] Default Scons build and backward compatibility (Csound/Fedora15)
Art Hunkins
abhunkin at uncg.edu
Wed Jun 15 15:56:34 EDT 2011
Peter -
Great news - your new Csound modules work *perfectly*.
FWIW, "perfectly" includes not only the crucial "old-parser" default, but also MIDI and multiple-controller MIDI. (I hadn't suspected problems with these latter two items, but thought I'd mention them anyway.)
In any case, my Csound-based activities run fine now without modification, and the new Fedora 15 SoaS release will be backwardly compatible as far as Csound (and Csound-python) is concerned.
BTW, I've a little hint about the "activities not opening" phenomenon. Though often (usually?) they do not open the first time they are selected, if they are selected *again* immediately, they always do open. (Or so it seems.)
Thanks again for all your help and forbearance with Csound.
Art Hunkins
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Robinson
To: Art Hunkins
Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 3:09 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [Csnd] Default Scons build and backward compatibility
easiest will be
"rpm -Uvh http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/csound/5.13.0/5.fc15/i686/csound-5.13.0-5.fc15.i686.rpm http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/csound/5.13.0/5.fc15/i686/csound-python-5.13.0-5.fc15.i686.rpm"
Peter
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:51 AM, Art Hunkins <abhunkin at uncg.edu> wrote:
Thanks, Peter.
I'll try this out tomorrow.
Do I upgrade simply with:
yum upgrade csound
?
Art Hunkins
----- Original Message -----h
From: Peter Robinson
To: Art Hunkins
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [Csnd] Default Scons build and backward compatibility
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/csound-5.13.0-5.fc15
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson at gmail.com> wrote:
Hmm. We'll see how we get on. Build csound-5.13.0-5.fc15 will have the change in it. It will be submitted as an update shortly.
Peter
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Art Hunkins <abhunkin at uncg.edu> wrote:
Peter,
FYI (another response). Felipe is the Debian maintainer for Csound. He's quite active and knowledgeable about Csound (and has followed it over a period of time), FWIW.
bmity
Art Hunkins
----- Original Message ----- From: "Felipe Sateler" <fsateler at gmail.com>
To: <csound at lists.bath.ac.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Csnd] Default Scons build and backward compatibility
I agree with most of your comments but...
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 13:02, Art Hunkins <abhunkin at uncg.edu> wrote:
Everyone knows I'm a Windows person, and normally wouldn't be affected
by such largely "Linux issues." However, I am involved with the Fedora-based
Sugar-on-a-Stick project. A new release is about to come out, and Csound has
been built with default Scons options, resulting in its being incompatible
with the Activities I've written, as well as with all previous
Sugar-on-a-Stick releases. This is "a problem that shouldn't be".
This is really a problem that shouldn't be, but not for the reasons
you argue. The csound maintainer in fedora should be specifying all
the features he wants and disabling all that he doesn't. Leaving the
build script to do whatever it feels like is wrong.
At the very least, the default Scons script should indicate clearly the
meaning of each option, and *in giant red letters/flags* (or the equivalent)
indicate experimental and untested features. Then by all means, make a safe
and compatible default build.
Am I way off base? Please let me know what I'm missing.
This is my opinion only, but relying on defaults is the wrong way to
build software.
--
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
Send bugs reports to the Sourceforge bug tracker
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=81968&atid=564599
Discussions of bugs and features can be posted here
To unsubscribe, send email sympa at lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe csound"
=
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20110615/1ffe7d84/attachment.html>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list