[Sugar-devel] FW: scratch on aslo

[Gonzalo Odiard]

But I don't think is a good idea add a activity without a maintainer.

Gonzalo

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Sebastian Silva
<sebastian at somosazucar.org>wrote:

>  Actually if the license permits it, there isnt a necessity to await
> confirmation by original author, although it would be nice to ask, IMHO
>
> El 14/12/11 19:46, Rafael Ortiz escribió:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Alan Jhonn Aguiar Schwyn <
> alanjas at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>       It's ok uploading those to aslo, if they have OSI compliant
>> Licences, pointing to original devs, also if they provide a good sugar
>> experience. More info here:
>>
>>
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Editors/Policy#Guidelines_for_accepting_an_activity
>>
>>
>>
>>  Ok. The "importants" are in ASLO.. maybe there are some that not..
>>
>>  I could test some and upload them. But corresponds me to do that? I do
>> not want to override the original developers ..
>>
>
> it's necessary to ask first the original devs.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing listSugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.orghttp://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20111215/88dc6fbc/attachment.html>