[Sugar-devel] [Dextrose] Dextrose 3 patches report
bernie at sugarlabs.org
Tue Dec 6 16:43:24 EST 2011
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 14:42 -0500, Chris Leonard wrote:
> Yes, Walter has more correctly characterized the issue of missing
> upstream glibc locales that was encountered.
> Pure speculation on my part, but I suspect that the fix for this will
> not only require a push to the glibc upstream, but a pull of those new
> locales by Fedora before the errors go away for Fedora packaging
It will take about 1.5 years for the patches to come back to us through
the upstream route (translators -> glibc -> Fedora -> OLPC-OS ->
Dextrose -> users).
I don't remember if I have the necessary copyright assignments on file
for glibc, but since I have a connection with the FSF, I volunteer to
submit the patches and deal with the glibc maintainer for the review
(wish me good luck, it's Ulrich Drepper).
First of all, we need to make sure that the current contents of the
locale definitions are correct for both Aymara and Quechua. Chris, could
you check with the translators?
Sugar Labs Infrastructure Team
More information about the Sugar-devel