[Sugar-devel] [Dextrose] Sugar-Scaling

[Gonzalo Odiard]

I don't think so.
One scale would be ok, the screens are no so different,
and with screens with 11:6 relation, the activities will fill the remaining
space.

Gonzalo

On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:47 AM, Esteban Bordón <ebordon at plan.ceibal.edu.uy
> wrote:

> Would be better to discompose SUGAR_SCALING in two separate variables,
> something like SUGAR_SCALING_W and SUGAR_SCALING_H
>
> chhers,
> Esteban.
>
>
>
>
> 2011/8/26 Frederick Grose <fgrose at gmail.com>
>
>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Rafael Ortiz <
>> rafael at activitycentral.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> We are beginning to adapt activities to a JumPC (Olidata) Screen
>>> resolution fixed to [800 x 480], afaik sugar scaling is set to 70% or 100%,
>>> this shouldn't be enough for some cases as flavio pointed out..we are going
>>> to test adding the zoom() method to hardcoded sizes, but medium term we
>>> shall come out with a way of having different values for sugar-scaling in
>>> order to fit these kind of screens.
>>>
>>> Thoughts on this are appreciated!.,
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>> Dextrose mailing list
>>> Dextrose at lists.sugarlabs.org
>>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/dextrose
>>
>>
>> Forwarding to sugar-devel, as this is a good question for future support
>> of Sugar in small screen devices.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dextrose mailing list
>> Dextrose at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/dextrose
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dextrose mailing list
> Dextrose at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/dextrose
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20110829/37b424e9/attachment-0001.html>