[Sugar-devel] [SoaS] Policy for activities for downstream inclusion

Sascha Silbe sascha-ml-reply-to-2010-3 at silbe.org
Wed Sep 15 10:27:45 EDT 2010

Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Wed Sep 15 12:33:30 +0200 2010:

> > Personally I'm moving to the point where if there's not a tarball I
> > won't spend my time packaging it.
> Yes, I think the effort for uploading a bundle that can be easily 
> generated with the tools in sugar is not asked to much to have the 
> activity then packaged in a distribution.

Do you expect only developers of activities in Fructose to follow that
process (documented on the Development Team/Release [1] page on the
wiki) or others as well?
If the latter, we should start by documenting this requirement. I couldn't
find any place in the wiki (that could do with some spring cleaning, BTW)
explaining how to get your activity published at all, let alone how to
please packagers.


[1] http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Development_Team/Release
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20100915/8d123664/attachment.pgp 

More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list