[Sugar-devel] [Dextrose] [PATCH v5 sugar] Pulsing icon delayed by 5 seconds or so SL#2080
anurag at seeta.in
Tue Oct 26 08:11:58 EDT 2010
The conclusion of XO-1.5 being nearly 2.5 times faster than the XO-1 could
be verified by comparing their hardware specifications.
at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLPC_XO-1 (For XO-1) and
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Hardware_specification_1.5 (For XO-1.5) .Also we
can see the test results of James'(quozl) at
http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/245 which suggests that XO-1.5 is atleast
twice as fast as XO-1.
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:45 PM, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:57:03AM +0200, Sascha Silbe wrote:
> > Excerpts from Anurag Chowdhury's message of Mon Oct 25 19:22:09 +0200
> > > In my logs I noted an average processing time of 0.85 sec for running
> > > first run of the update () function (i.e. while rendering of the first
> > > ) and since a XO-1.5 is nearly 2.5 times faster than a XO-1 so this
> > > processing time would approximate to nearly 2.3 second of delay , [...]
> > How did you arrive at this number ("2.5 times faster")? For what kind of
> > operation?
> I agree with Sascha, I don't think "nearly 2.5 times faster" is a
> reliable method to predict an outcome. The hardware is very different;
> different CPU, memory, and video "card".
I also agree on the point that we should not rely on a vague idea of a
faster XO-1.5 than an XO-1 to judge the delay accordingly.
But still since the XO-1.5 is much faster than XO-1 , and also the issue
relates to rendering of an icon which relates to a graphic processing
ability , so we are bound to get better(if not 2.5 times better) results on
> James Cameron
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Sugar-devel