[Sugar-devel] Fwd: Testing Summary - Wellington, 9 Oct 2010
walter.bender at gmail.com
Sun Oct 10 08:17:33 EDT 2010
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Tim McNamara
<paperless at timmcnamara.co.nz> wrote:
> Forwarding to Sugar-devel..
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Tim McNamara <mcnamara.tim at gmail.com>
> Date: Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 4:43 PM
> Subject: Testing Summary - Wellington, 9 Oct 2010
> To: OLPC NZ <olpc-nz at lists.laptop.org>
> ## sliderule-21
> Kristina =>
> - failed to load: log exerpt :-
should fix the problem.
> Testing Manual
> There are two types of tests that people generally do when we are supporting
> OLPC and Sugar Labs.
> - general mucking about:
> - we want to learn if there are any behviours that seem normal to the
> software developers that doen't seem normal to new users, especially
Be great to get more insight into this... kids tend to me more
adaptable than developers (and adults in general).
> - we want to hold activites to a consistent standard. This means that
> buttons do what they say they do.
> - regression testing:
> - testing that a fix to bug actually fixes the problem it says it does
> - testing that a fix doesn't cause something else to reoccur
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
More information about the Sugar-devel