[Sugar-devel] Proposal of dotted activity version number

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Thu Oct 7 12:37:33 EDT 2010


On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 12:45:11PM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
>
>> So the proposed 1.2.3-peru numbering scheme really is a 1.2.3 scheme 
>> with an optional trailing taint hint?
[snip]
>> It probably makes better sense to clearly distinguish those two 
>> essentially separate issues:
[snip]
>It's clear in the previous examples?

Nope. You insist on discussing both issues together. Very confusing.


  - Jonas

-- 
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20101007/cc9f2ff9/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list