[Sugar-devel] Bundle format
Simon Schampijer
simon at schampijer.de
Mon Nov 29 04:08:17 EST 2010
On 11/23/2010 01:47 PM, Walter Bender wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 6:50 AM, Bert Freudenberg<bert at freudenbergs.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 23.11.2010, at 05:07, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 10:53 -0500, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>>>> (oh, and the .zip file already has a checksum, it's not clear why
>>>> you'd need another one.)
>>>
>>> Ah, cool... but I guess it's not a cryptographically secure one, right?
>>>
>>> Plus, I was thinking... shouldn't we support a bundle format with better
>>> compression than zip? My favorite pick would be tar + xz, but if we want
>>> to retain the file-by-file accessibility of zip, 7z would also work
>>> well.
>>
>> IMHO the gains to be had from a slightly smaller download do not outweigh the ubiquity of the zip format. No other archive format is as widely supported. It can easily be examined and created on any platform.
>
> +1
Yes, keeping the zip format sounds desired to me as well. Widely
supported, the same that other projects like open office use for
archiving, too.
Regards,
Simon
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list