[Sugar-devel] [PATCH 06/21 sugar-toolkit] PEP8 cleanup: fix inline comment spacing
Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-reply-to-2010-3 at silbe.org
Fri Nov 19 11:31:09 EST 2010
Excerpts from Simon Schampijer's message of Fri Oct 29 12:50:30 +0200 2010:
[reordered quotes to make the context clear]
[src/sugar/presence/activity.py]
> > @@ -683,11 +683,16 @@ class _JoinCommand(_BaseCommand):
> > # since only the owner can change invite-only, that would break
> > # activity scope changes.
> > props = {
> > - 'anonymous': False, # otherwise buddy resolution breaks
> > - 'invite-only': False, # anyone who knows about the channel can join
> > - 'invite-restricted': False, # so non-owners can invite others
> > - 'persistent': False, # vanish when there are no members
> > - 'private': True, # don't appear in server room lists
> > + # otherwise buddy resolution breaks
> > + 'anonymous': False,
> > + # anyone who knows about the channel can join
> > + 'invite-only': False,
> > + # so non-owners can invite others
> > + 'invite-restricted': False,
> > + # vanish when there are no members
> > + 'persistent': False,
> > + # don't appear in server room lists
> > + 'private': True,
> > }
> In the second case in this patch I think having them in the same line is
> easier to read. Might be taste. A lot of those comments are not that
> helpful anyway - we should revise them in another go.
At least one of the existing comments was past the 79 character boundary,
so I would have had to either put it on two lines (but still inline) or
make just that one comment non-inline. I don't like either of those
choices. :)
Sascha
--
http://sascha.silbe.org/
http://www.infra-silbe.de/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20101119/d9e357b6/attachment-0001.pgp>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list