[Sugar-devel] anonymous ASLO messages

[Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero]

On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Aleksey Lim <alsroot at member.fsf.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 09:36:37PM -0500, Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero
> wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Aleksey Lim <alsroot at member.fsf.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:18:48PM +1100, James Cameron wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:20:22AM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:51:51AM +1100, James Cameron wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 11:23:46PM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 09:53:18AM +1100, James Cameron wrote:
> > > > > > > > These announcements from activities.sugarlabs.org of new
> > > releases are
> > > > > > > > sent without any included identity of the person who did the
> > > release.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Could activities.sugarlabs.org please be changed to include
> the
> > > releaser
> > > > > > > > in these messages?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The problem is that uploaders don't include release notes. The
> > > proper
> > > > > > > fix might be do not accept them (from uploading checks), so
> patches
> > > are
> > > > > > > welcome :).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > No, I think you misunderstand.  My observation has nothing to do
> with
> > > > > > whether release notes are present in the mail message.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Where's the code?
> > > > >
> > > > > http://git.sugarlabs.org/projects/slo-activities
> > > > > http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activity_Library/Devel/Installing
> > > >
> > > > The file site/app/views/editors/email/aslo/release_en_plain.thtml
> > > > contains what looks like the release messages, but I cannot see where
> it
> > > > is used.  What is needed is the authenticated user's e-mail address.
> > > >
> > > > > But keep in mind that current code is php/cake based and
> > > > > new ASLO will be based on new AMO python/django code. So, would be
> > > > > useful if patch is not invasive and might be applied w/o starting
> new
> > > > > development/testing/production cycle.
> > > >
> > > > That says to me, "don't do anything, your effort will be wasted,
> nobody
> > > > else cares about this problem."  Thanks for the warning.  I see no
> way
> > > > forward.
> > >
> > > The thing is, we are using not supported AMO code base that have
> > > long standing bugs. Upstream has switched to django and we need to do
> > > the same. So, if you was thinking about easy hacking, then you was
> wrong ;)
> > >
> >
> >
> > from   AMO's Wiki [1] the migration is not yet complete:
> >
> > ''This project is currently underway, and will take some cycles to
> complete.
> > Bugs that take too much work to fix will likely be delayed until Zamboni
> is
> > completed, in order to prevent duplicate work when porting features.''
> >
> > Zamboni [2] is the code name for the Django project.
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.mozilla.org/AMO:Editors/InfoEditors
> > [2]http://blog.fligtar.com/2010/01/15/amo-zamboni-planning-underway/
>
> Mozilla uses Zamboni in production
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/AMO:Developers



I was outdated then :(.

>
> And Remora page says "Remora is no longer maintained"
> https://wiki.mozilla.org/Update:Remora
>
> I have long running plans about close (but not in launchpad way)
> integration of SL services, Bazaar + ASLO + ...
> The first step (during 0.92 release cycle), I'm planing to do, will be
> switching ASLO to Zamboni (with keeping existed functionality).
>

it sounds like a good plan, great!.


> --
> Aleksey
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20101109/504d216c/attachment-0001.html>