[Sugar-devel] Request to review solution for SL #2464

[Gonzalo Odiard]

Thanks James.
The problem with the permissions in the activity.info file must be because
the last time i created the xo file by hand with zip and now i am using
setup.py
I will put this information information in the ticket.
I am trying to add fill/linux64_27 but fedora 14 is crazy in my machine...

Gonzalo


On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 4:13 AM, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 09, 2010 at 02:33:02AM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote:
> > I have uploaded a new xo to http://dev.laptop.org/~gonzalo/Paint-29.xo<http://dev.laptop.org/%7Egonzalo/Paint-29.xo>
> > I don't have a 0.82 system, can anybody confirm if is working ok?
>
> Tested on freshly installed XO-1 OLPC OS 8.2.1 build gg-802-1, Sugar
> 0.82.1, and it starts okay.  This addresses the problem in SL #2464.
>
> I was able to draw, quit, and then restore the drawing.
>
> There were no unusual messages in the log.  Attached.
>
> Also checked that it is essentially the same as git master for Paint,
> except for the activity.info file version line.
>
> Reviewed the changes from activities.sugarlabs.org Paint-28 and your
> Paint-29 ... apart from the code changes, the other interesting things
> were:
>
> - MANIFEST is present in -29, not in -28, (is it needed?),
> - a patch file is present in -28, not in -29, (this is good),
> - .gitignore present in -28, not in -29, (this is good),
> - fill/linux32_27 was added in -29, (this is good).
>
> Well done.
>
> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.linux.org.au/
>



-- 
Gonzalo Odiard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20101109/ba744a71/attachment.html>