[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Default ad-hoc networks
Paul Fox
pgf at laptop.org
Thu May 6 08:34:11 EDT 2010
simon wrote:
> Did we settle on the naming of the network. I was in favor of 'local
> network' as that mimics well the range of the network for me. James
> meant that this could be confused with 'localhost', if I remember
> correctly. 'Our network' was another option. Any good argument, or
> another option?
surprisingly, "ad-hoc" describes them pretty well. :-)
seriously, it captures that they are informal, self-managed, and
probably temporary.
"impromptu" carries some of the same feeling.
"informal", or "casual" might work, too. it's certainly how i
think of ad-hoc networks -- i.e., the opposite of "managed" or
"requiring infrastructure".
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf at laptop.org
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list