No subject
Mon Mar 15 02:42:15 EDT 2010
and currently meeting with Peter about it.<br>
<br>
<sdziallas> satellit__: this is the issue:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1900">http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1900</a><br>
<br>
<satellit_> sdziallas: any answer on read replacenent/fix<br>
<br>
<mchua> satellit_: I think the plan is just to take it out of the
build entirely - it'd take a while to fix.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:1273586096.7804.718.camel at giskard" type="cite">
<pre wrap=""></pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I plan to rapidly enter the findings listed on the spreadsheet into ASLO.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
Thanks! At this time, the #1 blocker for upgrading to Sugar 0.88 is that
very few activities are marked as compatible.
Aleksey: to speed-up Thomas' work, maybe we could hack the database to
pre-mark all 0.86-compatible activities as compatible? So he would just
need to un-mark those which turn out to be incompatible.
The release-notes for Sugar 0.88 claim no changes in the activity API,
so we can expect almost every activity that works on 0.86 to also work
on 0.88.
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>
--------------020106030609010300080402--
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list