[Sugar-devel] Status of 3G backport to 0.84
tomeu at tomeuvizoso.net
Wed Mar 10 02:17:42 EST 2010
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 20:59, Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org> wrote:
> <Daniel_C> erikos: yes, in that case we should make a backporting
> <Daniel_C> erikos: i know that martin and bernie were working in that sense
> <erikos> Daniel_C: yeah, I read that yesterday
> We had trouble getting the code backported to 0.84 to work until we
> finally figured out that GsmPalette.set_status() was overriding a method
> with the same name in its superclass. An unfortunate naming clash.
These situations suck, any ideas about how to avoid this?
> Today we got the first connection! I'll spin a 3G enabled F11-XO1 build
> in a while :-)
Great news! Congratulations to all involved, it's a beautiful example
of the Paraguay and Uruguay communities working together with the
global community. Pity that the patch from Ceibal Jam's Andres didn't
got in yet, maybe it will get backported later?
> // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
> \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
More information about the Sugar-devel