[Sugar-devel] Defining "sugar HEAD".
Thomas C Gilliard
satellit at bendbroadband.com
Sun Jun 13 16:41:24 EDT 2010
I have been testing applications in 4 GB Soas Live USB's created, with
persistence, with a script:
./livecd-iso-to-disk --format --reset-mbr --overlay-size-mb 1200
xxxx.iso /dev/sdb*
SUGAR VERSIONS:
1-Mirabelle o.88.0
2-Nightly Composes f14 -rawhide 0.88.1
I have tested applications in these forms
1- supplied on the Soas.iso
1a - CP Software updates
2- yum install sugar* (.rpms)
a 41 file install
3- run from a 2nd USB holding 140+ applications from ASLO. (.xo)
The results are entered in an Ooo Spreadsheet and uploaded to Tgillard
http://people.sugarlabs.org/Tgillard/Activities-Index-ASLO-f13-Mirabelle-f14-rawhide-Soas-tests.ods
Where should these tests (which list) be reported and how?
I am presently announcing on [soas] when there is an update.
* Note there is also an older Ooo ss that covers strawberry/blueberry
releases on Tgilliard
I am not sure iwhere these tests fit in with your listing.
Cordially;
Tom Gilliard
satellit
on freenode #sugar
Michael Stone wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> We've done some good work in the past few weeks getting the Sugar patch
> generation and review processes unstuck. Interesting new patches are now being
> published and reviewed with some frequency, which is great.
>
> (Particular thanks are due to James, Bernie, and Tomeu for their work reviewing
> patches and bringing patches to sugar-devel@ for review.)
>
> However, in order for us to be able to make an awesome release in a couple of
> months, we need to get the merge and testing processes unstuck too.
>
> What do you think of these suggestions on how to approach these issues?
>
> 1. Can we get better at gently nudging people to review or to merge patches
> that have been overlooked so that fewer patches slip by into limbo?
>
> 2. Can we define a single "sugar HEAD", updated on a weekly basis, which
> folks can test on whichever [1] platform they like best?
>
> 3. Can we start organizing the creation and publishing of test results for
> whatever "sugar HEAD" turns out to be, much like we did for "Friends in
> Testing" for OLPC?
>
> Regards, and thanks in advance for your thoughts,
>
> Michael
>
>
>
> [1]: Platforms that I know people like testing on so far include:
>
> * jhbuild
> * XO-1's
> * XO-1.5's
> * SoaS
> * normal distros
> * distro chroots
> * iPads
> * LTSP?
> * <your platform here>
>
> Did I miss anyone?
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
>
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list