[Sugar-devel] Hypothetical sugar-0.90 material, draft 1.
luke at faraone.cc
Wed Jun 9 23:04:48 EDT 2010
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 06/09/2010 08:11 PM, Bernie Innocenti wrote:
> As far as I know, Browse is still the only hulahop user on this planet,
> so it's not like we need to keep it around for API compatibility.
Actually, hulahop is used by pyjamas, as evidenced by these bug
reports spawned when sugar-hulahop was removed from Ubuntu Lucid.
An aside, according to upstream this is not an integral part of their
project, but it might be a good idea to involve them in the discussion.
Going forward, Canonical is trying to get rid of most of the XULRunner
embedders, which prompted the removal of hulahop in the first place.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Sugar-devel