[Sugar-devel] [PATCH] fix trivial typo in extension loading exception

[Tomeu Vizoso]

On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 03:57, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:19:08AM +0200, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 06:39, James Cameron <quozl at laptop.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 08:17:32AM +0000, Sascha Silbe wrote:
>> >> While you're at it, can you avoid the escaping by using different
>> >> quotes and replace "%" with "," (for consistency with our style
>> >> guidelines - it doesn't really make a difference in this particular
>> >> case), please?
>> >
>> > Heh. ?Sure. ?Tell me where your style guidelines are?
>> >
>> > Diversion.
>> >
>> > What we're missing from the process at the moment is the people who
>> > apply the patches are supposed to say so as a reply to the thread.
>> > Either nobody is applying these reviewed patches, or those who are
>> > applying them are not saying so. ?;-}
>>
>> Unfortunately, the old process is still in place. A new process will
>> enter into effect when the wiki is changed.
>
> I think you should test a proposed new process and not wait for it to
> enter into effect.  If you don't have time to test the process, then it
> means the new process cannot be adopted, because it is untested.

Well, but I guess we want to test a particular new process and for
that, it needs to be written somewhere. Otherwise, each of us could
end up testing a different process.

Bernie was going to propose concrete changes but then got diverted to
the realness summit. Is something stopping the other interested
parties to propose the process they think is better?

Regards,

Tomeu

> --
> James Cameron
> http://quozl.linux.org.au/
>