[Sugar-devel] [DESIGN] Restart
Paul Fox
pgf at laptop.org
Fri Jul 16 08:40:06 EDT 2010
bernie wrote:
> People in Paraguay complained for the removal of the Restart function
> from Sugar 0.88:
>
> http://trac.paraguayeduca.org/ticket/672
>
> I suspect it's just natural user resistance to any UI change, so I asked
> for rationale.
>
> The change was requested by dsd, also without any good rationale to
> justify it:
>
> http://bugs.sugarlabs.org/ticket/1206
i'm was far more surprised by moving shutdown to the top of that
menu (i use the control panel a lot more than shutdown) than i was
by the removal of restart.
are the releases you're user-testing running powerd? if so, it's the
first large-scale usage of the new suspend-or-shutdown menu, so i'm
interested in reaction to that. for instance -- is shutdown really
the most often used menu item, now that the machine can be shut down
with the power button? and i know you have idle suspend disabled
otherwise i'd be interested in hearing about the timeouts associated
with those.
paul
>
>
> I'm posting this for public discussion of this design issue, but I
> suspect the discussion will not go anywhere without some user data. When
> I'm back to Paraguay, I will ask my testers who have been using 0.88 for
> 3 weeks how they feel about all the UI changes:
>
> * Buddy menu reorder (control panel last)
>
> * Removal of restart
>
> * palette open delay shortened to 0 seconds (experimental)
>
> * frame hot corners disabled by default (experimental)
>
> Anything else we would like feedback on?
>
> This story IMHO brings back the long-debated topic of testing UI changes
> with users. There's a chicken-and-egg problem, of course: we can't do
> user testing until we write the code, apply the patch, build binaries
> and install them on a statistically significant portion of our
> user-base.
>
> In my opinion, we should let dubious UI changes happen and revert them
> if we get negative feedback: taking the risk to piss off a few
> early-adopters is the only way to avoid a design paralysis.
>
> --
> // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
> \X/ Sugar Labs - http://sugarlabs.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf at laptop.org
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list