[Sugar-devel] Uruguay violates GPL by deleting root on OLPCs
geirea at gmail.com
Wed Jul 7 09:41:17 EDT 2010
Please, when you say Uruguay you should just say Plan Ceibal.
Has anyone formally requested Plan Ceibal to correct this situation?
2010/7/7 John Gilmore <gnu at toad.com>:
>> > Ignoring the fact that some deployments ship without root access.
>> Is the practice of completely locking-down the laptops something we'd
>> even want to encourage?
> Shipping the laptops TiVoized like Uruguay does has put them into serious
> legal trouble. OLPC should definitely not encourage anybody else to do this.
> Why bankrupt your project by losing a copyright enforcement lawsuit?
> Shipping the laptops without root access is a direct violation of the
> GPLv3 license on a dozen packages (probably 50+ packages in later
> Fedoras). They have shipped binaries, while using technological means
> to deny the recipient the practical ability to upgrade or replace them
> with versions modified or chosen by the recipient.
> Only an idiot would distribute hundreds of thousands of units while
> setting themselves up to pay the Free Software Foundation any amount
> of money they demand. (Given the way OLPC and Uruguay have
> ignored the notice that they're in violation, for years, I do hope FSF
> extracts both future compliance, and its next ten years of operating
> expenses, from these scofflaws.)
> Or does Uruguay think, "Sue us for copyright violation in our own
> courts -- we'll make sure you lose"?? In other words, do they
> just brazenly steal the GNU Project's software, knowing it's wrong?
> John Gilmore
> Devel mailing list
> Devel at lists.laptop.org
More information about the Sugar-devel