[Sugar-devel] [PATCH] Add cpu and memory resource indicator to frame
Paul Fox
pgf at laptop.org
Fri Jul 2 08:36:43 EDT 2010
i know people don't like to think about queues, and load
averages, but the unix load average numbers give a much better
picture of how hard your system is being asked to work than
instantaneous CPU utilization. CPU utilization makes for pretty
bar graphs though, so i suppose it will always win.
as an extra benefit, the 1-minute load average is pre-calculated,
available with a read of a single field from /proc/loadavg.
paul
sascha wrote:
> > + self.proc_stat_new = self.__getTimeList()
> If you make all the other attributes private, you should make proc_stat_*
> private as well.
> You can probably even git rid of storing proc_stat_new in the instance
> at all - it doesn't need to be accessible across iterations (= timer
> callback invocations).
>
> > + for i in range(len(self.proc_stat_new)) :
> > + self.proc_stat_new[i] -= self.proc_stat_old[i]
> A better set of variable names might help understanding what this does
> and why it is necessary (/proc/stat entries are absolute times in
> USER_HZ units). cpu_time_counts might be a start.
>
> > + cpu_free = (self.proc_stat_new[len(self.proc_stat_new) - 1] * 100.00 /
> > + sum(self.proc_stat_new))
>
> This equates to (iowait * 100) / (user + nice + system + idle + iowait),
> so it's the percentage of time spent in iowait. I don't think it's a
> useful figure for how busy (or idle) the CPU is.
> If we decide not to split up iowait (it indicates permanent storage
> activity, which we don't have an indicator for on XO-1) and idle,
> we should at least add them:
>
> cpu_times_current = [new - old
> for new, old in zip(cpu_time_counts_new, self._cpu_time_counts)]
> user, nice, system, idle, iowait = cpu_times_current
> cpu_free = (idle + iowait) * 100 / sum(cpu_times_current)
>
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf at laptop.org
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list