[Sugar-devel] [POLL] Dotted Activity Versions

[Simon Schampijer]

On 01/14/2010 09:24 PM, Gary C Martin wrote:
> On 14 Jan 2010, at 19:14, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>
>> On 01/14/2010 05:06 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 19:45, Aleksey Lim<alsroot at member.fsf.org>   wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 06:44:36PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>>>> *** Pending
>>>>> Dotted activity Versions:
>>>>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Dotted_Activity_Versions
>>>>> --->   needs an owner
>>>>> --->   final poll to take a decision which scheme to use
>>>>
>>>> schemes are
>>>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Dotted_Activity_Versions#Detailed_Description
>>
>> /me votes clearly for the second option.
>>
>> Regards,
>>     Simon
>>
>>
>> ---- just in case :)
>>
>> [2] reuse existing activity_version field as a major part of dotted
>> version and new field for minor part,<  0.88 user will see only
>> activity_version and>= 0.88 will see activity_version.new_field
>> version, in that case we don't break existing versioning line e.g.
>> Browse-104 will be Browse-104 (even after adding new version w/
>> incremented new_field value) for all sugars(but>= 0.88 users will see
>> incremented part)
>
> +1 from me if it helps a consensus and moves us forward.
>
> Regards,
> --Gary

I think we are clear on this one. Do we have any takers of this coding task?

Regards,
    Simon