[Sugar-devel] [POLL] Dotted Activity Versions
Gary C Martin
gary at garycmartin.com
Thu Jan 14 15:24:33 EST 2010
On 14 Jan 2010, at 19:14, Simon Schampijer wrote:
> On 01/14/2010 05:06 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 19:45, Aleksey Lim<alsroot at member.fsf.org> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 06:44:36PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>>> *** Pending
>>>> Dotted activity Versions:
>>>> ---> needs an owner
>>>> ---> final poll to take a decision which scheme to use
>>> schemes are
> /me votes clearly for the second option.
> ---- just in case :)
>  reuse existing activity_version field as a major part of dotted
> version and new field for minor part, < 0.88 user will see only
> activity_version and >= 0.88 will see activity_version.new_field
> version, in that case we don't break existing versioning line e.g.
> Browse-104 will be Browse-104 (even after adding new version w/
> incremented new_field value) for all sugars(but >= 0.88 users will see
> incremented part)
+1 from me if it helps a consensus and moves us forward.
More information about the Sugar-devel