[Sugar-devel] [POLL] Dotted Activity Versions

[Gary C Martin]

On 14 Jan 2010, at 19:14, Simon Schampijer wrote:

> On 01/14/2010 05:06 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 19:45, Aleksey Lim<alsroot at member.fsf.org>  wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 06:44:36PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>>> *** Pending
>>>> Dotted activity Versions:
>>>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Dotted_Activity_Versions
>>>> --->  needs an owner
>>>> --->  final poll to take a decision which scheme to use
>>> 
>>> schemes are
>>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Dotted_Activity_Versions#Detailed_Description
> 
> /me votes clearly for the second option.
> 
> Regards,
>    Simon
> 
> 
> ---- just in case :)
> 
> [2] reuse existing activity_version field as a major part of dotted 
> version and new field for minor part, < 0.88 user will see only 
> activity_version and >= 0.88 will see activity_version.new_field 
> version, in that case we don't break existing versioning line e.g. 
> Browse-104 will be Browse-104 (even after adding new version w/ 
> incremented new_field value) for all sugars(but >= 0.88 users will see 
> incremented part)

+1 from me if it helps a consensus and moves us forward.

Regards,
--Gary