[Sugar-devel] [POLL] Dotted Activity Versions
Simon Schampijer
simon at schampijer.de
Thu Jan 14 14:14:30 EST 2010
On 01/14/2010 05:06 PM, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 19:45, Aleksey Lim<alsroot at member.fsf.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 06:44:36PM +0100, Simon Schampijer wrote:
>>> *** Pending
>>> Dotted activity Versions:
>>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Dotted_Activity_Versions
>>> ---> needs an owner
>>> ---> final poll to take a decision which scheme to use
>>
>> schemes are
>> http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Features/Dotted_Activity_Versions#Detailed_Description
/me votes clearly for the second option.
Regards,
Simon
---- just in case :)
[2] reuse existing activity_version field as a major part of dotted
version and new field for minor part, < 0.88 user will see only
activity_version and >= 0.88 will see activity_version.new_field
version, in that case we don't break existing versioning line e.g.
Browse-104 will be Browse-104 (even after adding new version w/
incremented new_field value) for all sugars(but >= 0.88 users will see
incremented part)
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list