[Sugar-devel] [POLL] Non Sugar Platform activities in Activity Library

[Benjamin M. Schwartz]

Aleksey Lim wrote:
> Please suggest your variants and attach your +/-

All of the above.  ASLO should warn the user if an activity is
arch-dependent, generate a bundle appropriate to the user's settings, and
make sure that the generated bundle's name indicates the supported
architectures. (e.g WatchMe-2.xo.F13-sparc32+Lenny-IA64)

Ultimately, though, I think we need to move 0install into Glucose.  Then
to share an activity bundle with a friend, all I have to do is transfer
the package URL.  My friend's Sugar install can then use
0share/packagekit/0launch to get whatever components are necessary for her
system... possibly even from me via 0share, or possibly from ASLO.

--Ben

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20100227/1e5ad0de/attachment.pgp