[Sugar-devel] Feature Freeze exception request: Journal Sort
Aleksey Lim
alsroot at member.fsf.org
Mon Aug 23 13:09:52 EDT 2010
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 04:48:33PM +0000, Aleksey Lim wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:08:30PM -0300, Andrés Ambrois wrote:
> > On Monday, August 23, 2010 04:25:48 am Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> > >
> > > - creation time will be always displayed as '%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S' ? What
> > > about those countries where they expect the fields being ordered in a
> > > different way? (may be good to format the string in listview.py
> > > instead of in listmodel.py, so we keep UI decisions out from the
> > > model).
> >
> > I agree with that separation of concerns. In fact it was initially that way,
> > but the format is required by activities such as Etoys, that break unless we
> > use it. Other activities may also be depending on it, as it is documented in
> > [0].
>
> If are talking about UI representaion, then it is ok ("ago" format).
> About internal representaion, Andrés, for what readon we store ctime in ISO,
> what about int value (to keep it in the same format as timestamp)?
Sorry, didn't see [0] (was thinking that we dind't expose any ctime
fields before), what about renaming ctime ds field and using int value.
--
Aleksey
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list