[Sugar-devel] Appropriate to call myself "senior developer"?

[Tomeu Vizoso]

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 22:00, James Simmons <nicestep at gmail.com> wrote:
> This thread has made me wistful.  I go to a conference every year
> called "No Fluff Just Stuff".  The guy who runs it has the title "Meme
> Wrangler".  I've had several different titles at my day job, every one
> more dismal than the last.  The work and the pay doesn't change, just
> the title.  What I wouldn't give to be a "Meme Wrangler", or a
> "Wizard", or a "Lord High Executioner", or even an "Oompah-Loompah",
> even if the job didn't pay anything.
>
> Maybe that could be an inducement to volunteer for Sugar Labs.  Make a
> significant contribution and somebody in authority, maybe Walter
> Bender, gives you a cool title.  Maybe a signed certificate you could
> hang in the office of your day job.

Sounds good if it encourages people to take bits of responsibility.

Regards,

Tomeu

> James Simmons
>
>
>> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 12:26:33 -0400
>> From: Bernie Innocenti <bernie at codewiz.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Sugar-devel] Appropriate to call myself "senior
>>        developer"?
>> To: Lucian Branescu <lucian.branescu at gmail.com>
>> Cc: sugar-devel <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>,      Sascha Silbe
>>        <sascha-ml-reply-to-2010-2 at silbe.org>
>> Message-ID: <1281889593.1936.237.camel at giskard>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>>
>> El Sun, 15-08-2010 a las 11:41 +0100, Lucian Branescu escribi?:
>>> > ...as long as I can be "Senior Wizard Extraordinaire and ?berhaxc0r at
>>> > Sugar Labs and everywhere else" :-)
>>>
>>> Calling ourselves wizards would be interesting.
>>
>> Oompa-Loompas might be more appropriate :-)
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oompa-Loompa
>>
>> --
>>   // Bernie Innocenti - http://codewiz.org/
>>  \X/  Sugar Labs       - http://sugarlabs.org/
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>