[Sugar-devel] [Csnd] Re: Getting around a (sound) device assignment problem in SoaS
Art Hunkins
abhunkin at uncg.edu
Tue Sep 29 12:53:38 EDT 2009
Rick,
I'll be happy to do such a page at Csounds.com.
I'll need to wait, however, until the project is complete. Three things need
to happen:
1) The multiple MIDI controller option of 5.10 needs to be patched into the
Sugar Fedora updates (and shown to work);
2) This all needs to be available in a regular Sugar release (hopefully,
0.86 but probably later - until then, users/developers won't have easy
access to all the features of 5.10, and without updates the current and only
Sugar-on-a-Stick Strawberry [0.84] doesn't have a working Csound at all);
3) My Activities are properly posted at Sugar Labs (to be widely available).
They cannot be posted until #1 occurs, hopefully sometime in October,
according to Peter Robinson.
Meanwhile, we're nearly there.
Art Hunkins
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr. Richard Boulanger" <rboulanger56 at gmail.com>
To: <csound at lists.bath.ac.uk>
Cc: <csound at lists.bath.ac.uk>; <pbrobinson at gmail.com>;
<sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 10:32 AM
Subject: [Csnd] Re: Fw: Re: Re: Re: Getting around a (sound) device
assignment problem in SoaS
Art,
Now that you have figured all this out, it would be cool for you to
create a SOS page for us at cSounds.com or Sourceforge. What do you
think. Victor showed me SOS a few months back and it was pretty
wonderful. I think that many csounders would like it especially if
all the pieces, links, tips and toots were all in one place.
Appreciating all your efforts in this area.
-Rick
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 29, 2009, at 10:25 AM, "Art Hunkins" <abhunkin at uncg.edu> wrote:
> I neglected to mention perhaps the most important fact of all: with SoaS,
> any MIDI controller(s) must be plugged in AFTER boot and BEFORE compiling
> a .csnd. Users must be given explicit instruction to this effect.
>
> Note that this limitation does not apply to the XO.
>
> My thoughts are:
> 1) Getting around this limitation is far more trouble that it's worth;
> 2) In the world of XO and Sugar-on-a-Stick a potential misunderstanding
> would arise rarely in any case.
>
> Art Hunkins
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Art Hunkins" <abhunkin at uncg.edu>
> To: <csound at lists.bath.ac.uk>
> Cc: <pbrobinson at gmail.com>
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 4:35 PM
> Subject: Re: [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Getting around a (sound) device
> assignment problem in SoaS
>
>
>> Hi, Andres,
>>
>> With further experimentation, I've found that the following <CsOptions>
>> will work fine for my purposes in the XO-1/Sugar-on-a- Stick context:
>> -odac -+rtaudio=alsa -+rtmidi=alsa -M hw:1,0
>>
>> Comments:
>> Alsa is low-latency as is supported (to this date) on all XO and SoaS
>> platforms.
>> -odac refers indeed to the default plughw and makes the conversions you
>> mention, at no apparent cost - whereas -odac:hw:0,0 does not. - odac will
>> thus work as long as there is a single (usually the builtin) hardware
>> device. This is something I can count on.
>> -M hw:1,0 will work as long as only one controller is attached (which I
>> can count on for my single-controller .csd's), and as long as any
>> built-in MIDI interface (rare these days, as Peter pointed out) is not
>> being used. I think I can count on MIDI being via USB. (If someone on
>> the outside chance *did* want to use a builtin MIDI interface, he can
>> change hw:1,0 to hw:0,0.)
>>
>> So, the above will work in all usual configurations, as long as:
>> built-in audio is used;
>> one USB MIDI controller is used
>>
>> For my multiple MIDI controller versions, these will use: -
>> +rtmidi=alsa -Ma
>> as soon as Peter finds the time to incorporate your multi- controller
>> patch.
>>
>> Once this is achieved, all my issues are settled, and I'll be a "happy
>> camper" (= find my joy).
>>
>> Art Hunkins
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andres Cabrera"
>> <mantaraya36 at gmail.com
>> >
>> To: <csound at lists.bath.ac.uk>
>> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 3:27 PM
>> Subject: [Csnd] Re: Re: Re: Getting around a (sound) device assignment
>> problem in SoaS
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since there's been no reply, I'll take a stab, but I may be compeltely
>> wrong...
>>
>> I think alsa names hw: real hardware devices. Hardware devices can be
>> constrained as to the number of channels or sample rates supported.
>> There might be software interfaces to these devices (like the alsa
>> "default" interface), which are plughw: devices, which can take care
>> of sample rate conversion and different number of channels. To
>> override the default settings, you would need to mess with the
>> .asounrc file, which I wouldn't recommend since it might take you a
>> while, as it is not very documented.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andres
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Art Hunkins <abhunkin at uncg.edu> wrote:
>>> In starting down the road Victor suggests (and to solve the problem
>>> addressed in the subject), I immediately ran into an anomaly. I've no
>>> idea
>>> whether the issue is Csound's or Sugar/Linux.
>>>
>>> Description:
>>> In working with the XO-1, I settled on a stereo SR=32000. (This is the
>>> maximum SR I can use with my .csd's and get glitch-free sound on the
>>> XO-1.)
>>>
>>> I developed all my work using the <CsOption> -odac
>>>
>>> Faced with the fact of different device assignments with Sugar on a
>>> Stick
>>> (Soas) when MIDI controller(s) are inserted prior to boot, I need to
>>> check
>>> for other assignments for -odac, such as hw:1,0.
>>>
>>> Bottom line: -odac executed fine with SR=32000; -odac:hw:0,0 (its
>>> apparent
>>> equivalent) does not, *though it does fine with SR=44100!* The error
>>> message
>>> is: Unable to set sample rate on soundcard. Failed to initialize real
>>> time
>>> audio output.
>>>
>>> Apparently there is a difference between 'plughw' (as -odac is referred
>>> to
>>> in my error log) and -odac:hw:0,0 (referred to as hw:0,0 in log).
>>>
>>> Linux folk: what is going on here? I need both to: 1) use SR=32000, and
>>> 2)
>>> test for different hardware device assignments - including - odac:hw:1,0
>>> (it
>>> too doesn't like SR=32000).
>>>
>>> Art Hunkins
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "victor" <Victor.Lazzarini at nuim.ie
>>> >
>>> To: <csound at lists.bath.ac.uk>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 3:52 AM
>>> Subject: [Csnd] Re: Getting around a (sound) device assignment problem
>>> in
>>> SoaS
>>>
>>>
>>>> The compile() function in the API (and in the csndsugui module)
>>>> returns
>>>> 0 if successful and non-zero if not. You can check for this and
>>>> recompile
>>>> with different options (etc) until it works.
>>>>
>>>> Victor
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Art Hunkins" <abhunkin at uncg.edu>
>>>> To: <sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org>
>>>> Cc: <csound at lists.bath.ac.uk>
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 4:03 AM
>>>> Subject: [Csnd] Getting around a (sound) device assignment problem in
>>>> SoaS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> For SoaS (Fedora Linux), there remains a problem of device assignment
>>>>> involving audio out and MIDI in.
>>>>>
>>>>> Basically, if you boot SoaS *then* plug in a MIDI controller, audio
>>>>> is
>>>>> assigned C0D0; and MIDI, C1D0 (this is as expected). If you plug in a
>>>>> MIDI
>>>>> controller and then boot SoaS, MIDI gets C0D0 and audio C1D0 (this is
>>>>> *not*
>>>>> as expected!)
>>>>>
>>>>> The latter arrangement generates the following error message (in its
>>>>> Log)
>>>>> when
>>>>> a script is run:
>>>>> Can't open device 'plughw' for audio output.
>>>>>
>>>>> It will be necessary to either do something either in Sugar, its
>>>>> Csound
>>>>> module, or in the python script that runs Csound to work with this
>>>>> issue.
>>>>> So far, I've tried making manual changes to the file names
>>>>> (reflecting
>>>>> the "proper"
>>>>> device numbers, but the error remains.
>>>>>
>>>>> Suggestions? Especially from the Sugar side?
>>>>>
>>>>> It would seem that Sugar needs to
>>>>> look for and assign *audio* device numbers before *MIDI* device
>>>>> numbers.
>>>>> (Please
>>>>> note that this issue does *not* exist for the native XO-1. Perhaps
>>>>> snooping around
>>>>> in that code would be enlightening.) I'd appreciate the help; I'm
>>>>> absolutely lost here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Art Hunkins
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Send bugs reports to this list.
>>>>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa at lists.bath.ac.uk with body
>>>>> "unsubscribe
>>>>> csound"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Send bugs reports to this list.
>>>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa at lists.bath.ac.uk with body
>>>> "unsubscribe
>>>> csound"
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Send bugs reports to this list.
>>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa at lists.bath.ac.uk with body
>>> "unsubscribe
>>> csound"
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> Andrés
>>
>>
>> Send bugs reports to this list.
>> To unsubscribe, send email sympa at lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
>> csound"=
>
>
>
> Send bugs reports to this list.
> To unsubscribe, send email sympa at lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
> csound"
Send bugs reports to this list.
To unsubscribe, send email sympa at lists.bath.ac.uk with body "unsubscribe
csound"=
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list