[Sugar-devel] [Karma] 640 px width? was Re: [Karma] Introduction, thanks and questions
Christoph Derndorfer
christoph.derndorfer at gmail.com
Thu Sep 24 00:24:46 EDT 2009
I can't say I really agree, in my mind it looks pretty good
(see पर्दाछवि.png).
One problem is that on stage 1 we're using more vertical space than we have
when using browse w/ the toolbars (see पर्दाछवि_1_2_3_4.png), this is
something that definitely needs attention.
However one really odd issue I kept running into while trying to take these
screenshots is that at every pageload the icons seemed to randomely move
about (see पर्दाछवि_1.png, पर्दाछवि_1_2.png and पर्दाछवि_1_2_3.png for what
I mean). I don't remember seeing that behaviour before so I'm assuming the
css is somehow messed up.
@Pavel: Do you think you could take a quick look at this issue? Thanks.
Christoph
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Roshan Karki <roshan at olenepal.org> wrote:
> too small for the xo screen
>
> Bryan Berry wrote:
> > On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 08:13 +0500, roshan karki wrote:
> >> It didn't looked ok.
> >
> > u mean, it looked bad?
> >
> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Bryan Berry <bryan at olenepal.org>
> >> wrote:
> >> christoph, does 640px for the width of chakra look ok on the
> >> XO?
> >>
> >> On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 00:42 +0545, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:
> >> > Roshan karki schrieb:
> >> > > > 2) Can you please make the thumbnails "2X2" instead of
> >> "1X4"
> >> > >
> >> > > @Roshan: I'm not sure what you mean by this... :-?
> >> > >
> >> > > I mean putting four thumnails in 2 rows and 2 columns like
> >> we had or as
> >> > > in your attachment.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks, Bryan pointed that out to me in the afternoon,
> >> unfortunately I
> >> > haven't had the time to reimplement this yet.
> >> >
> >> > (@Pavel: Any advice or suggestions on how to achieve this
> >> cleanly are
> >> > very much welcome.)
> >> >
> >> > > Also I think we decided not to use combo-box. Correct me
> >> if I am mistaken.
> >> >
> >> > Indeed, as mentioned in my previous e-mail drop-down menus
> >> are a no-go
> >> > hence my reimplementation is using tabs again.
> >> >
> >> > Cheers,
> >> > Christoph
> >> >
> >> --
> >> Bryan W. Berry
> >> Technology Director
> >> OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
> >>
> >>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sugar-devel mailing list
> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>
--
Christoph Derndorfer
co-editor, olpcnews
url: www.olpcnews.com
e-mail: christoph at olpcnews.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090924/c15cb36d/attachment-0001.htm
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ????????_1.png
Type: image/png
Size: 54664 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090924/c15cb36d/attachment-0005.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ????????_1_2.png
Type: image/png
Size: 65578 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090924/c15cb36d/attachment-0006.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ????????_1_2_3.png
Type: image/png
Size: 56465 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090924/c15cb36d/attachment-0007.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ????????_1_2_3_4.png
Type: image/png
Size: 68783 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090924/c15cb36d/attachment-0008.png
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ????????.png
Type: image/png
Size: 103366 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090924/c15cb36d/attachment-0009.png
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list