[Sugar-devel] [Karma] 640 px width? was Re: [Karma] Introduction, thanks and questions

[Christoph Derndorfer]

FYI: Here's two more screenshots using Surf and after having changed the
width from 640px to 800px...
Christoph

On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Christoph Derndorfer <
christoph.derndorfer at gmail.com> wrote:

> I can't say I really agree, in my mind it looks pretty good
> (see पर्दाछवि.png).
> One problem is that on stage 1 we're using more vertical space than we have
> when using browse w/ the toolbars (see पर्दाछवि_1_2_3_4.png), this is
> something that definitely needs attention.
>
> However one really odd issue I kept running into while trying to take these
> screenshots is that at every pageload the icons seemed to randomely move
> about (see पर्दाछवि_1.png, पर्दाछवि_1_2.png and पर्दाछवि_1_2_3.png for what
> I mean). I don't remember seeing that behaviour before so I'm assuming the
> css is somehow messed up.
>
> @Pavel: Do you think you could take a quick look at this issue? Thanks.
>
> Christoph
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Roshan Karki <roshan at olenepal.org> wrote:
>
>> too small for the xo screen
>>
>> Bryan Berry wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 08:13 +0500, roshan karki wrote:
>> >> It didn't looked ok.
>> >
>> > u mean, it looked bad?
>> >
>> >> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Bryan Berry <bryan at olenepal.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>         christoph, does 640px for the width of chakra look ok on the
>> >>         XO?
>> >>
>> >>         On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 00:42 +0545, Christoph Derndorfer wrote:
>> >>         > Roshan karki schrieb:
>> >>         > >  > 2) Can you please make the thumbnails "2X2" instead of
>> >>         "1X4"
>> >>         > >
>> >>         > > @Roshan: I'm not sure what you mean by this... :-?
>> >>         > >
>> >>         > > I mean putting four thumnails in 2 rows and 2 columns like
>> >>         we had or as
>> >>         > > in your attachment.
>> >>         >
>> >>         > Thanks, Bryan pointed that out to me in the afternoon,
>> >>         unfortunately I
>> >>         > haven't had the time to reimplement this yet.
>> >>         >
>> >>         > (@Pavel: Any advice or suggestions on how to achieve this
>> >>         cleanly are
>> >>         > very much welcome.)
>> >>         >
>> >>         > > Also I think we decided not to use combo-box. Correct me
>> >>         if I am mistaken.
>> >>         >
>> >>         > Indeed, as mentioned in my previous e-mail drop-down menus
>> >>         are a no-go
>> >>         > hence my reimplementation is using tabs again.
>> >>         >
>> >>         > Cheers,
>> >>         > Christoph
>> >>         >
>> >>         --
>> >>         Bryan W. Berry
>> >>         Technology Director
>> >>         OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Christoph Derndorfer
> co-editor, olpcnews
> url: www.olpcnews.com
> e-mail: christoph at olpcnews.com
>



-- 
Christoph Derndorfer
co-editor, olpcnews
url: www.olpcnews.com
e-mail: christoph at olpcnews.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090924/4b0eebba/attachment-0001.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot.png
Type: image/png
Size: 69150 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090924/4b0eebba/attachment-0002.png 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot_1.png
Type: image/png
Size: 71815 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20090924/4b0eebba/attachment-0003.png