[Sugar-devel] [IAEP] Project Guidelines posted

[Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero]

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Walter Bender <walter.bender at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Bryan Berry <bryan at olenepal.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 12:25 -0500, David Farning wrote:
>>> Project/SIGs are product focused.  The exist to help guide a project
>>> through it's life cycle.  For example, there has recently been some
>>> rather heated discussions about working more closely with Qt.  This is
>>> an example of a idea the could start as a SIG and grow into a project
>>> and be included in the Learning Platform.... if it proves useful.
>>
>> Sorry to have not been involved in this conversation.
>>
>> So it sounds to me like Karma should be an SL SIG and later an SL
>> Project. I really don't have an idea of how it will be governed but I
>> will leave that to later as i see how the community around it develops.
>> So I guess Karma can't progress from SIG to project until the leadership
>> process is defined.
>>
>> I feel bad because I have been putting the SL logo on the
>> karmaeducation.org site. Sorry if I was using the SL branding
>> prematurely. I also put the SL logo in the Karma presentations.
>>
>
> Huh? Seems like an appropriate use of the logo to me.
>

For me also, it follows perfectly the guidelines:,

http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Marketing_Team/Logo#Logo_usage


> -walter
>>
>> --
>> Bryan W. Berry
>> Technology Director
>> OLE Nepal, http://www.olenepal.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Sugar-devel mailing list
>> Sugar-devel at lists.sugarlabs.org
>> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/sugar-devel
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Walter Bender
> Sugar Labs
> http://www.sugarlabs.org
> _______________________________________________
> IAEP -- It's An Education Project (not a laptop project!)
> IAEP at lists.sugarlabs.org
> http://lists.sugarlabs.org/listinfo/iaep
>