[Sugar-devel] Fwd: [Marketing] 2009 Free Software Awards
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Thu Oct 8 16:15:16 EDT 2009
On Fri, Oct 09, 2009 at 08:17:00AM +1300, Tim McNamara wrote:
>2009/10/8 Rafael Enrique Ortiz Guerrero <rafael at sugarlabs.org>
>
>> fyi ..Sugar or it's representative should be nominated :).
>>
>> http://www.fsf.org/news/2009FSAwardsCall
>>
>>
>Hi all,
>
>Apologies for my lack of knowledge. Does Sugar contain any non-free
>components?
In principle that depends on your definition of "free".
However, to the best of my knowledge, all parts of "Sucrose" - the
official core part of Sugar, is free according to the Debian Fre
Software Guidelines (DFSG) which I believe fit the "free" as defined by
FSF.
Parts of Sugar (the squeak-vm package needed by Etoys) is treated as
"non-free" in Debian but that is not due to licensing issues but rather
the oddity of "source code" being binary so currently unmaintainable by
the Debian security team.
So the short answr is "yes!" :-)
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20091008/eddabf69/attachment.pgp
More information about the Sugar-devel
mailing list