[Sugar-devel] Namespace for 0.84 updates to Browse and Chat?

[Jonas Smedegaard]

Hi Tomeu (and others),

On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 06:48:05PM +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>sorry for the late reply, this is a very good question.
>
>I think we should move to dotted version numbers for activities in 
>0.88, maybe interpreting a version number without a dot as 0.xx.
>
>For now and for your specific use case, what about preppending 
>0.84/0.86 to the activity version number?

Debian supports resetting version numbers, but it may cause problems for 
other distributions if Sugarlabs start releasing new packages with 
_lower_ version numbers than the older ones.

As an example, are you sure that your Mozilla web interface supports 
resetting version numbers?  Do the install mechanisms in Sugar itself?


  - Jonas

-- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/sugar-devel/attachments/20091002/3bedbcf3/attachment.pgp