[Sugar-devel] Rationale behind the JSON -> CJSON switch in Sugar codebase?

Tomeu Vizoso tomeu at sugarlabs.org
Fri Nov 13 06:36:43 EST 2009

On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:01, Daniel Drake <dsd at laptop.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 11:50 +0100, Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
>> For past stable releases, deployers are the ones who should know best.
>> If you are talking about 0.82, then we should go back to use
>> simplejson. If this is 0.84 on F11, then we can use what python 2.6
>> provides.
> 0.82 doesn't have this bug - we're talking about an 0.84 regression
> introduced by the post-0.82 switch to cjson, right?

Sorry I'm not following this issue close enough.

> If I'm going to maintain 0.84 further then the a requirement for
> anything included should be that it is already included in git master.
> So I'd still like your input on this, please, since we also want to fix
> in current/future releases :)

Sure, just attach a patch and mark the ticket with r?, I also
appreciate if people ping me whenever I lag behind review.



«Sugar Labs is anyone who participates in improving and using Sugar.
What Sugar Labs does is determined by the participants.» - David

More information about the Sugar-devel mailing list